Nouvelle version G'MIC 3.3.3 compatible Gimp 2.99
Téléchargement :
Volume de gmic-3.3.3_gimp-2.99-Win64+UCRT64_QT6.7z : 50 363 327 octets
-
Hachage MD5 de gmic-3.3.3_gimp-2.99-Win64+UCRT64_QT6.7z :
78f357d4e75bfb70c99f7b3eefc11173
-
Hachage SHA256 de gmic-3.3.3_gimp-2.99-Win64+UCRT64_QT6.7z :
0c17f82cc8a48d8a1e12b36e5ac977a6db6804c5395371327495ec31e0a03e1f
-
Hachage SHA512 de gmic-3.3.3_gimp-2.99-Win64+UCRT64_QT6.7z :
6dbb16e3a8ab87ac64a37cbfcbe6bffe839fc41ff9e225a4b1f3b0583ebf970356c557618479184181baa4340750376f711f785c8fcff4f4ed091f5ecba03654
-
L'installation est dans le fichier lisez-moi.txt
Ne pas mélanger les exécutables et les DLL des 2 compilations (MINGW64/MSVCRT et UCRT64).
Problème :
Le bogue "About > What's new? / About > Download External Data" existe toujours :o(
*****
Quelques exemples obtenus avec le nouveau filtre 'Poincaré Disk' :
1200,1200,1,4
samj_Cercles_Qui_Tournent 1200,255,255,255,255,0,1,0.5,0.33,7,17,1,0.5,0.33,7,17,1,1120,0,0,0,255,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.5,0.5,1.8,0
fx_poincare_disk. 6,3,100,20,0,1,1,1,50,50,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,255,255,255
o test3_fx_poincare_disk.png
1200,1200,1,4
samj_etoile_de_pompei_153. 50,50,30,90,255,255,255,255,170,255,255,255,0,98,147,255,0,59,89,255,1,0
fx_poincare_disk. 6,3,100,3,0,1,1,1,50,50,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,255,255,255
o test_fx_poincare_disk.png
1200,1200,1,4
samj_etoile_de_pompei_153. 50,50,30,90,255,255,255,255,170,255,255,255,0,98,147,255,0,59,89,255,1,0
souphead_droste10. 40,100,1.25,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,10,1,0,90,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0
fx_poincare_disk. 6,3,100,5,0,1,1,1,50,50,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,255,255,255
o test2_fx_poincare_disk.png
1200,1200,1,4
samj_Motifs_Rapides 2345,19,1234,30,0,10,1234,0,0,1,0,255,170,0,128,0,0
fx_poincare_disk 12,3,100,20,0,0,1,1,50,50,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,255,255,255
o test4_fx_poincare_disk.png
*****
*****
*****
I can't check, because I'm still using 2.10. So I ask you: has your filter "Testing/Frame" modified? I wrote about it on PIXLS, but you did not answer. The problem is the calculation of frame amount: on an image 1000x500 asking a frame of 10% the position of the inside corner is 83/84 , 72. While 83/84 is correct assuming you take the biggest dimension as base (width 1000:1.2) 72 is neither fixed (i.e equal to 83/4) nor proportional (i.e. equal to 41/42). Thanks
RépondreEffacerHello Dinasset,
EffacerI wish you a happy new year :o)
We were absent when your question was asked and I did not see it.
To answer your question, the result is normal as the filter is designed (it was an example to illustrate mixtures in a scrapbook workshop where people use 12 inch square renderings).
I will make a new corrected version.
Thank you for your tests: o)
Merci beaucoup, Sylvie.
RépondreEffacerThe filter is modified :
Effacerhttps://github.com/GreycLab/gmic-community/commit/c11bfeb295f86ae7946f0c5209d3994cf7f21b59
The size of the frame is taken on the largest dimension of the image inside the frame.
There may be impossibilities and in this case the filter works as before this modification.
:o)
Tested, OK ! Thanks, Sylvie.
RépondreEffacer